← All resources

Complyify vs. AccessiBe: Why the FTC's $1 Million Fine Should Change Your Decision

If you've been researching ADA compliance tools for your Shopify store, you've probably come across AccessiBe. It's one of the most heavily marketed accessibility products in the world. It's also the first accessibility vendor to be fined by the Federal Trade Commission. Here's what that means for merchants who are weighing their options.

What AccessiBe Actually Does

AccessiBe installs a single JavaScript snippet on your website. That script injects a floating icon — the little accessibility wheel you've seen on thousands of sites — which opens a control panel with profiles like "seizure safe" and "vision impaired."

Behind the scenes, AccessiBe's AI scans your DOM every 24 hours and attempts to add ARIA attributes, generate alt text, and patch keyboard navigation issues. The company has marketed this as being able to make any website "WCAG compliant" by adding one line of code.

That claim is what got them in trouble.

The FTC's $1 Million Fine

In January 2025, the Federal Trade Commission proposed a $1 million fine against AccessiBe, finalized in April 2025. The FTC found that AccessiBe's marketing claims were deceptive — specifically that a JavaScript snippet could deliver WCAG compliance to any site. The order prohibits AccessiBe from making unsubstantiated compliance claims going forward.

This wasn't a fringe finding. It was the FTC — the agency that enforces consumer protection law — formally concluding that AccessiBe's core marketing pitch was false.

Overlays Don't Stop Lawsuits

Here's the number that matters most: in 2024, 1,023 companies that had an accessibility widget installed were still sued for ADA violations. That's 25% of all accessibility lawsuits filed that year, against websites that had already paid for a compliance product.

Plaintiff attorneys know this pattern. Some now specifically target sites with overlay widgets because it demonstrates the merchant was aware of accessibility obligations and chose a shortcut instead of genuine remediation.

AccessiBe's own litigation pledge — which promises legal support if you get sued while using their product — has been criticized as covering only specific plan tiers and providing minimal actual help when invoked.

The Technical Reality

WCAG compliance requires correct HTML structure at the source. JavaScript running after page load cannot reliably fix:

Over 1,000 accessibility professionals have signed the Overlay Fact Sheet, a public document detailing exactly why overlays cannot deliver what they promise.

AccessiBe Pricing vs. What You Get

PlanPriceWhat it actually does
Micro$490/yearWidget + AI ARIA patching for 5k visits/mo
Growth$1,490/yearAbove + $15k litigation pledge
Scale$3,990/yearAbove + annual expert review, $20k pledge

The litigation pledge sounds like insurance. It isn't. It's a promise to assist, not indemnify — and the FTC action suggests the underlying compliance claim it's based on doesn't hold up.

How Complyify Approaches the Same Problem

Complyify starts from a different premise: the goal is genuine remediation, not the appearance of it.

Pricing: $29/month (Basic) to $79/month (Pro). No per-visit tiers. No litigation pledges that substitute for real fixes.


This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Pricing information reflects publicly available rates as of early 2026 and may have changed.